MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037898135 · doi:10.1109/itsc.2012.6338837

Application of reinforcement learning with continuous state space to ramp metering in real-world conditions

2012· article· en· W2037898135 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kasra Rezaee, Baher Abdulhai, Hossam Abdelgawad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningTestbedRepresentation (politics)Computer scienceState spaceConvergence (economics)Metering modeState (computer science)Focus (optics)Controller (irrigation)Artificial intelligenceAlgorithmMathematicsEngineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we introduce a new approach to Freeway Ramp Metering (RM) based on Reinforcement Learning (RL) with focus on real-life experiments in a case study in the City of Toronto. Typical RL methods consider discrete state representation that lead to slow convergence in complex problems. Continuous representation of state space has the potential to significantly improve the learning speed and therefore enables tackling large-scale complex problems. A robust approach based on local regression, named k nearest neighbors temporal difference (kNN-TD), is employed to represent state space continuously in the RL environment. The performance of the new algorithm is compared against the ALINEA controller and typical RL methods using a micro-simulation testbed in Paramics. The results show that RM using the kNN-TD method can reduce total network travel time by 44% compared to the do-nothing case (without RM) and by 17% compared to ALINEA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTraffic control and managementFrench-language works237,207