MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037906071 · doi:10.1109/ficloud.2014.46

Courteous Priority Access to the Shared Commercial Radio for Public Safety in LTE Heterogeneous Networks

2014· article· en· W2037906071 on OpenAlexaff
Chafika Tata, Michel Kadoch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkComputer scienceBlocking (statistics)Network packetHeterogeneous networkQuality of serviceComputer securityTelecommunicationsWirelessWireless network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a solution to allow priority access to the Shared Commercial Radio (SRC) for Public Safety (PS) in LTE Heterogeneous Networks (LTE HetNets). This access is tolerated only during the emergency situations. In fact, when the radio resources are available, the Allocation Retention Priority (ARP) scheme accepts the establishment of all new bearers, but when the resources are limited, the ARP mechanism bloc some bearers which have low priorities. Therefore, the lower priority traffics may suffer significantly from packet loss due to the blocking of the low priority bearers. To improve the quality of service of these traffics, a new approach is developed in this paper, namely Courteous Priority Access (CPA) to the Shared Commercial Radio for Public Safety in LTE Heterogeneous networks. In addition, as the Public Safety Network (PSN) and Commercial Network (CN) share a part of radio resources, it will be relevant to manage the bearer's access to the SRC by developing a new mechanism of radio resources allocation with constraints. These constraints are depending of the priority of bearers which request the resources. Thus, the Courteous Allocation Constraints model for Frequencies (CAMF) has been developed in this paper to define the different quantities of radio resources which may be reserved to the two types of networks, namely, PSN and CN. These resources will be allocated to the arrival bearers by using CPA algorithm. The simulation results show that on one hand CPA reduces the number of the commercial blocked bearers and increase the number of commercial active bearers, and on the other hand it keep an acceptable level of PS blocking bearers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207