MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037912088 · doi:10.1063/1.3544360

Fluctuating lattice-Boltzmann model for complex fluids

2011· article· en· W2037912088 on OpenAlexaff
Santtu T. T. Ollila, Colin Denniston, Mikko Karttunen, Tapio Ala-Nissilä

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilTekesAcademy of FinlandAlfred Kordelinin Säätiö
KeywordsThermostatStatistical physicsPhysicsLattice Boltzmann methodsThermal fluctuationsThermalComplex fluidMechanicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop and test numerically a lattice-Boltzmann (LB) model for nonideal fluids that incorporates thermal fluctuations. The fluid model is a momentum-conserving thermostat, for which we demonstrate how the temperature can be made equal at all length scales present in the system by having noise both locally in the stress tensor and by shaking the whole system in accord with the local temperature. The validity of the model is extended to a broad range of sound velocities. Our model features a consistent coupling scheme between the fluid and solid molecular dynamics objects, allowing us to use the LB fluid as a heat bath for solutes evolving in time without external Langevin noise added to the solute. This property expands the applicability of LB models to dense, strongly correlated systems with thermal fluctuations and potentially nonideal equations of state. Tests on the fluid itself and on static and dynamic properties of a coarse-grained polymer chain under strong hydrodynamic interactions are used to benchmark the model. The model produces results for single-chain diffusion that are in quantitative agreement with theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicLattice Boltzmann Simulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207