Pseudostatic corrections for the forced vibroacoustic response of a structure-cavity system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The analysis of the coupled vibroacoustic behavior of a structure-cavity system is often performed using the in vacuo structure modes and the rigid cavity modes. Unfortunately, the use of such a modal basis can result in a poor convergence when the high-frequency modes of one of the two subsystems are coupled to the low-frequency modes of the other subsystem. This problem is made critical by the lack of a reliable criterion for selecting the number of kept modes for each subsystem. This paper shows that the effect of modal truncation is critical for the convergence of the method and that the convergence can be greatly improved using pseudostatic corrections for both the structure and the cavity. The theory behind the proposed technique is presented together with two generic problems exhibiting strong coupling: (i) an elastic cylindrical cavity filled with air; and (ii) an elastic plate coupled to a rectangular cavity filled with water.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it