Low-Dose Vasopressin Improves Cardiac Function in Newborn Piglets With Acute Hypoxia-Reoxygenation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cardiovascular dysfunction in asphyxiated neonates contributes significantly to their morbidity and mortality. We have recently shown that a low-dose vasopressin infusion (0.005 - 0.01 units/kg per hour) may improve myocardial oxygen transport balance in a swine model of neonatal hypoxia-reoxygenation. We aimed to compare the systemic and regional hemodynamic effects of low-dose vasopressin to dobutamine, a synthetic beta-adrenoreceptor agonist. Piglets (1 - 5 days old, 1.6 - 2.2 kg) were anesthetized and instrumented to continuously monitor systemic hemodynamic parameters, including cardiac output and mesenteric flow indices. After 2 h of hypoxia (10% - 15% O2), piglets had normoxic reoxygenation for 4 h. In a blinded randomized fashion, piglets received infusion of either vasopressin (0.01 units/kg per hour started at 30 min of reoxygenation) or dobutamine (20 μg/kg per minute started at 2 h of reoxygenation) (n = 8 per group). Hypoxia-reoxygenation controls (placebo, n = 8) and sham-operated (n = 5) piglets were also studied. Tissue lactate, glutathione, glutathione disulfide, and lipid hydroperoxides levels and histology of the left ventricle and the small bowel were analyzed. Plasma was also analyzed for troponin-I and intestinal fatty acid-binding protein levels. Piglets subjected to hypoxia-reoxygenation had cardiogenic shock and metabolic acidosis, which improved on reoxygenation. During recovery, cardiac output and mesenteric flows gradually deteriorated and were increased similarly in vasopressin- and dobutamine-treated piglets (P < 0.05 vs. controls). Plasma troponin-I and left ventricular lactate levels were lower in the vasopressin and dobutamine groups (P < 0.05 vs. controls), with no difference in the histological analysis among groups. The intestinal GSSG/GSH ratio and lipid hydroperoxides level were lower in the vasopressin and dobutamine groups (P < 0.05 vs. controls). This study is the first to demonstrate that a low-dose vasopressin infusion used in the setting of neonatal swine model of hypoxia-reoxygenation is associated with an improvement in cardiac output and mesenteric perfusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".