MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2037946110 · doi:10.1118/1.2760774

SU-FF-T-117: Comparison of 3D Dose Measurements in Ferrous Xylenol Orange Gels with Mapcheck Diode Array and Pinnacle3 Dose Calculations

2007· article· en· W2037946110 on OpenAlexaff
K Jordan, Gordana Stanković-Babić, J Chen, Jerry Battista

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImaging phantomOpticsLinear particle acceleratorNuclear medicineMaterials scienceScannerDosimetryVoxelBeam (structure)Biomedical engineeringPhysicsMedicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To compare 3D dose distributions calculated using the Pinnacle3 (Philips Medical Systems) planning system and measured with a Mapcheck™ diode array with those obtained by independent sets of ferrous xylenol orange (FX) gels scanned optically. Methods: A beam for a clinical IMRT plan with a small planning target volume (PTV) was recalculated using Pinnacle3 (1×1×3 mm voxels) for delivery to a uniform flat water phantom with the linac (Varian Clinac 2100EX) gantry stationary at 0°. The beam was delivered to Mapcheck™ (Sun Nuclear Corporation) with a sequence of overlaying plastic sheets to acquire planar doses from depths of 20 to 70mm (5mm increments). Two FX gels were also irradiated with the IMRT beam and scanned optically with an in-house laser CT scanner and a commercial cone beam CT scanner (Vista™, Modus Medical Devices Inc.), respectively. A second pair of FX gels was irradiated with a 12MeV electron beam (Varian Clinac 2100C) to provide independent dose calibrations for the two scanners. Optical-CT reconstruction data at 0.125mm3 resolution were averaged to 1mm3 voxels for comparison. Mapcheck™ dose points were linearly interpolated to provide additional points for comparison. Results: Laser CT and cone beam CT (Vista™) scanning of FX gels provided similar dose distributions. In comparable slices, the doses were in agreement to within 3% of Mapcheck™ results. Agreement within 2% in dose was achieved for the four independent systems at a 50 mm depth. However, at shallow depths (<30mm) the Pinnacle3 calculation results were greater than the measured doses by up to 7%. Conclusions: FX gel dosimetry provided full 3D dose distributions with 0.5 mm3 resolution and dose at equivalent points agreed favourably with Mapcheck™ readings. Conflict of Interest: Two of the authors (KJ, JB) have a licensing agreement with Modus Medical Devices Inc. concerning the commercialization of Vista™.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Physics→Same topicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques→French-language works237,207→