Study of Al(OH)<sub>3</sub>−Polyacrylamide-Induced Pelleting Flocculation by Single Molecule Force Spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A nanocomposite polymer, Al(OH)3-polyacrylamide (Al-PAM) hybrid, was tested as a flocculant. This novel hybrid polymer was found to induce pellet-like floccules, leading to a more effective solid-liquid separation than common polyacrylamide (PAM)-based flocculants. To understand the mechanism of Al-PAM-induced pelleting flocculation, the molecular structure of this hybrid polymer was studied using an atomic force microscope (AFM). The interactions between Al-PAM molecules and a silica surface were measured using single molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS). The Al-PAM molecules were found to have a star-like structure with Al(OH)3 colloidal particles as cores connecting PAM chains. The SMFS results showed a strong attachment of the Al(OH)3 cores to the silica surface with an adhesion force of approximately 1250 pN, in contrast to a weaker adhesion force of only approximately 250 pN for PAM chains on the silica surface. The Al-PAM-induced pelleting flocculation is attributed to its star-like structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".