MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037996563 · doi:10.1109/iccsn.2011.6014024

A new cryptography scheme for selective broadcasting

2011· article· en· W2037996563 on OpenAlexaff
Dang Quan Nguyen, Louise Lamont

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroadcast encryptionComputer scienceCiphertextEncryptionComputer networkNode (physics)CryptographyBroadcasting (networking)Scheme (mathematics)Public-key cryptographyKey (lock)CollusionOverhead (engineering)Computer securityMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a new cryptography scheme that allows for selective broadcasting and precludes collusion between malicious nodes located inside the intended broadcast group as well as outside of the group. In our scheme, the decryption key for each node is customized and embeds personal information inherent to each node. Compared to the Attribute-based encryption approach (ABE) where the nodes satisfying a predefined set of attributes can decrypt a message, our scheme allows for the customization of each node's decryption key based on private information about a node. This approach discourages users to openly reveal their private information and disclose their private keys. Our scheme can achieve a constant ciphertext size regardless of the number of users in the broadcast group. We also present the storage overhead consideration and discuss some potential applications of this cryptography scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.006
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207