MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038003884 · doi:10.1139/p00-023

I. Geometrical optics of variable-frequency light rays:Theoretical basis

2000· article· en· W2038003884 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysics and Sensor Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsGeometrical opticsRayOpticsElectromagnetic radiationPhysical opticsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A variable-frequency light ray (VF ray) is a new concept in optics; it is a ray that is monochromatic at every point of the path (no frequency spread) but its frequency changes along the path due to interactions occurring along that path. For example, the frequency of the light ray can be affected by gravitational time dilation, reflection from a moving mirror, or coherent Raman scattering. Since the Fermat principle of least time (PLT) implicitly assumes that the frequency of the light ray is an irrelevant constant, the PLT-based geometrical optics is insufficient to handle propagation of VF rays. In this paper, we derive a new extremum principle (NEP) that is sensitive to changes of frequency along the path of the light ray and constitutes a basis for geometrical optics of VF rays. The NEP is derived directly from the principle of least action applied to the quantized electromagnetic field associated with the light ray propagating in a vacuum or in a transparent material medium in the presence of the gravitational field. The relationship between the NEP, the classical version of the Fermat principle, and the general relativistic generalization of the Fermat principle (the extremum principle for null geodesics) is discussed in detail. Applications of the NEP are suggested in the nonrelativistic, special relativistic, and general relativistic regimes. PACS Nos.: 42.15-i, 12.20-m, 04.20-q

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.654

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it