MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038003884 · doi:10.1139/p00-023

I. Geometrical optics of variable-frequency light rays:Theoretical basis

2000· article· en· W2038003884 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
W. T. Chyla

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysics and Sensor Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsGeometrical opticsRayOpticsElectromagnetic radiationPhysical opticsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A variable-frequency light ray (VF ray) is a new concept in optics; it is a ray that is monochromatic at every point of the path (no frequency spread) but its frequency changes along the path due to interactions occurring along that path. For example, the frequency of the light ray can be affected by gravitational time dilation, reflection from a moving mirror, or coherent Raman scattering. Since the Fermat principle of least time (PLT) implicitly assumes that the frequency of the light ray is an irrelevant constant, the PLT-based geometrical optics is insufficient to handle propagation of VF rays. In this paper, we derive a new extremum principle (NEP) that is sensitive to changes of frequency along the path of the light ray and constitutes a basis for geometrical optics of VF rays. The NEP is derived directly from the principle of least action applied to the quantized electromagnetic field associated with the light ray propagating in a vacuum or in a transparent material medium in the presence of the gravitational field. The relationship between the NEP, the classical version of the Fermat principle, and the general relativistic generalization of the Fermat principle (the extremum principle for null geodesics) is discussed in detail. Applications of the NEP are suggested in the nonrelativistic, special relativistic, and general relativistic regimes. PACS Nos.: 42.15-i, 12.20-m, 04.20-q

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicGeophysics and Sensor TechnologyFrench-language works237,207