MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038088995 · doi:10.1016/j.pratan.2014.01.008

Parturiente âgée (podcast)

2014· article· fr· W2038088995 on OpenAlexaff
Sandra Lesage, F.J. Mercier

Bibliographic record

VenueLe Praticien en Anesthésie Réanimation · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecologyPerinatal mortalityObstetricsPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé L’âge maternel avancé (35 ans ou plus) est un facteur de risque de naissance prématurée, de retard de croissance intra-utérin, de morbidité/mortalité périnatale et de césarienne. Malgré les risques qui croissent exponentiellement avec l’âge maternel, la morbidité et la mortalité maternelles et périnatales demeurent globalement basses. Les femmes donnant naissance à un âge avancé prennent souvent grand soin de leur santé et jouissent fréquemment d’une très bonne qualité de soins, ce qui amoindrit l’effet de l’âge sur le déroulement de leur grossesse et de leur accouchement. Les parturientes très âgées (45 ans ou plus) ont aussi un devenir globalement satisfaisant, peut-être en partie parce qu’elles ont recours au don d’ovocyte. Cependant, le taux de césarienne et la mortalité maternelle sont franchement accrus. L’anesthésiste-réanimateur doit donc rechercher les comorbidités anténatales chez ces patientes et doit être prêt à assurer l’anesthésie pour une césarienne en cours de travail ainsi que la gestion des éventuelles complications aiguës du péripartum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0980.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueLe Praticien en Anesthésie RéanimationSame topicAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyFrench-language works237,207