MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038110372 · doi:10.1139/t00-075

Saline water intrusion adjacent to the Fraser River, Richmond, British Columbia

2001· article· en· W2038110372 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Laurie Neilson-Welch, Leslie Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeologyHydrology (agriculture)Saline waterSalinityAquiferRiver deltaGroundwaterSaltwater intrusionStreamflowWedge (geometry)GeomorphologyOceanographyDeltaDrainage basinGeotechnical engineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During periods of average to low flow in the Fraser River, seawater from Georgia Strait migrates with a rising tide up the river channel, reaching distances up to 16 km from the river's outlet to the ocean. This relatively dense water infiltrates through the river bed and circulates as a stable wedge of saline water within permeable deltaic deposits adjacent to the river. At the Kidd2 site in Richmond, the wedge extends approximately 500 m inland from the river. The top of the transition zone between fresh and saline water is 10 m below ground surface. The bottom of the saline wedge is located at the contact with underlying low-permeability delta slope deposits, resulting in a wedge with a vertical extent of approximately 10 m. Maximum salinity values observed in the wedge (16–17 parts per thousand) reflect the time-averaged response to density-driven flow under a complex sequence of daily and seasonal variations in salinity within the Fraser River and mixing with fresh river water that may enter the aquifer during the summer freshet. Under the assumption of dynamic equilibrium, simulation of the saline wedge at the Kidd2 site suggests (1) the effective, long-term average salinity at the base of the river channel is approximately 19 parts per thousand; (2) the velocity of groundwater, directed inland in the central portion of the wedge, is in the range from 0.5 to 6 m/year; and (3) fresh water in the confined deltaic sands moves from inland areas toward the Fraser River under a hydraulic gradient of approximately 3 × 10 –4 .Key words: salt water intrusion, deltaic sediments, modeling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207