MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038155577 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2011.2165077

Magnetic Force Between Inclined Circular Filaments Placed in Any Desired Position

2011· article· en· W2038155577 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Power Transfer Systems
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPosition (finance)Elliptic integralElectromagnetic coilPhysicsInductanceSimple (philosophy)Series (stratigraphy)Classical mechanicsMechanicsComputer scienceMathematical analysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents new general formulas for calculating the magnetic force between inclined circular filaments placed in any desired position. We use two approaches to calculate the magnetic force, one based on Biot-Savart law and another based on the mutual inductance between these coils. All mathematical procedures are completely described to define coil positions that lead to relatively easy method for calculating the magnetic force between inclined circular filaments in any desired position. Two formulas obtained by the simple integration of different expressions in terms of complete elliptic integrals of the first and second kind give the same numerical results. The presented methods are understandable, numerically suitable and easy applicable for engineers and physicists. We validated the new formulas through a series of examples, which are presented here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it