Electronic continua in time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy. II. Corresponding ionization correlations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigate further the role of ion electronic continua in time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopic measurements of ultrafast nonadiabatic coupling. In the preceding paper [Blanchet, Zgierski, and Stolow, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 1194 (2000)], the limiting case of complementary ionization correlations permitted a disentangling of electronic from vibrational dynamics. Here we examine the other limiting case in which the nonadiabatically coupled sates (e.g., S2 and S1) correlations correspond to the same ionic continua, presumably an unfavorable case. We use ultrafast internal conversion in the polyaromatic hydrocarbons phenanthrene and naphthalene as examples. In this situation, the geometry changes (displacements) upon nonadiabatic crossing and upon ionization will strongly affect the ability to disentangle electronic from vibrational dynamics. Particularly, phenanthrene and naphthalene are both very rigid molecules and have small displacements upon internal conversion and ionization, still allowing for direct monitoring of the S2 state internal conversion rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".