MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038198163 · doi:10.1086/421698

Evolutionary Properties of Helium‐rich, Degenerate Dwarfs in Binaries Containing Compact Companions

2004· article· en· W2038198163 on OpenAlexaff
L. A. Nelson, Ernest Dubeau, Keith A. MacCannell

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsBishop's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsWhite dwarfNeutron starMetallicityMillisecond pulsarBrown dwarfInstability stripStellar evolutionStarsAstronomyCepheid variable

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The evolution of binaries containing low-mass donors (≤2 M ☉ ) and degenerate accretors (i.e., white dwarfs [0.7 M ☉ ] or neutron stars [1.4 M ☉ ]) is systematically investigated over a wide expanse of parameter space. The donors are assumed to have metallicities in the range of 0.0001 ≤ Z ≤ 0.02 and could be either unevolved (zero-age main sequence) or ascending the red giant branch at the onset of mass transfer [corresponding to 5 ≲ P orb (hr) ≲ 2 × 10 3 ]. The evolutionary tracks form part of a very detailed grid of nearly 200 sequences, each corresponding to a different set of initial conditions. During the initial phases of their evolution, the systems resemble either low-mass X-ray binaries or cataclysmic variables. However, as has been pointed out by several authors (e.g., Podsiadlowski et al.), the evolutionary tracks can exhibit a wide variety of behaviors and outcomes. We focus on systems that evolve to produce helium-rich degenerate dwarfs (HeDDs) that are either detached or still losing mass after a Hubble time. Of the systems that avoid dynamical instability, some evolve to ultrashort values of P orb (<60 minutes), while others that lie above the bifurcation limit (which we show to be quite sensitive to the assumed metallicity) produce wide binary millisecond pulsars (BMSPs) containing HeDD companions that have P orb values of ≲2 × 10 4 hr. We also show that the mass and composition of the envelopes of HeDDs that are about to descend the cooling branch are particularly sensitive to the input physics and this in turn dictates whether they experience extremely vigorous hydrogen shell flashes. Our computed values of the envelope mass, m env (corresponding to the mass of those layers below the surface containing some hydrogen), typically have a dependence on the final donor mass ( m f ) and metallicity ( Z ) that can be expressed as m env ∝ m Z -0.2 . Furthermore, for systems that do not evolve too close to the bifurcation limit , we find that the final orbital period is given by P orb, f (hr) ≅ 2.5 Z 0.3 × 10 . Finally, we use our results to comment on the properties of the optical companions to binary millisecond pulsars and compare their inferred ages with the spin-down times of the pulsars. The structure of young HeDDs should be particularly useful as starting models for more sophisticated cooling calculations that take into account important long-term physical processes and thus we are making our models available for retrieval.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations81
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207