MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transfusion and hemostasis in cardiac surgery

2008· editorial· en· W2038243310 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jerrold H. Levy, George J. Despotis

Bibliographic record

VenueTransfusion · 2008
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerioperativeHemostasisAntithromboticCardiopulmonary bypassPercutaneousCardiologyCoronary artery diseaseCardiac surgeryInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hemostatic abnormalities occur commonly after cardiac surgical interventions. Changes are linked to inflammatory responses by a network of humoral and cellular components including proteases of the clotting and fibrinolytic cascades. Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic strategies directed at attenuating and treating hemostatic system activation have been reported in experimental and clinical studies. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are at risk for excessive bleeding and associated complications. This bleeding often leads to transfusion of allogeneic blood and hemostatic blood components as well as reexploration. Excessive bleeding after cardiac surgery is related to changes in the hemostatic system secondary to both dilutional and activation and/or consumptive effects on both platelets (PLTs) and coagulation factors. Further compounding the issue of hemostatic abnormalities in cardiac surgical patients is the increasing use of long-acting anti-PLT or antithrombotic agents in this population. Anti-PLT therapy is routinely administered for cardiovascular disorders, especially as related to acute coronary syndromes and cardiologic interventions (e.g., percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, stents), and for managing ischemic stroke. PLT inhibitors, especially the thienopyridines, are increasingly being associated with an increased risk of bleeding, especially in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Although withdrawing these agents in patients with ischemic cardiovascular disease may decrease perioperative bleeding, it may also lead to adverse consequences as related to ischemic effects, particularly in patients having undergone percutaneous interventions, those with coronary artery stents, and those with unstable angina. Managing these complex patients poses a major problem for clinicians. Pharmacologic interventions have been extensively reported as means to attenuate the alterations in the hemostatic system during CPB in an attempt to reduce excessive bleeding, transfusion, and reexploration. Prophylactic administration of agents with antifibrinolytic and anti-inflammatory properties can decrease blood loss and transfusion. Antifibrinolytic agents are the most extensively studied blood conservation agent. On November 5, 2007, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) noted that Bayer, the manufacturer of aprotinin (Trasylol), will suspend the marketing of this drug until a comprehensive review of a Canadian study showing an increased risk of death can be performed. The FDA issued a communication in October 2007, describing recommendation to stop patient enrollment in the aprotinin treatment group arm of the: Blood conservation using antifibrinolytics: A randomized trial in a cardiac surgery population (BART) study. This information can be followed at the FDA Web site (http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/aprotinin/default.htm). Studies leading up to the randomized Canadian study will be discussed in these series and can be followed on the FDA Web site at http://www.FDA.gov, and are noted currently at (http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2007/NEW01738.html). The impact this will have on bleeding, transfusion requirements, and need for blood resources in cardiac surgical patients will be noteworthy to follow. The ability to reduce blood product transfusions and to decrease operative times and reexploration has important implications for patient outcomes, availability of blood products, and overall health care costs. Novel therapies are also under investigation that involve recombinant techniques and may improve our ability to attenuate hemostatic system activation or optimally manage excessive bleeding. At present, the main therapy for cardiac surgical patients who are bleeding involves maintenance of oxygen-carrying capacity with transfusion of allogeneic RBC units and hemostatic blood components to restore hemostasis. Transfusions also pose potential risks and may not always be effective with respect to the management of bleeding. Blood resources are increasingly scarce, and thus blood availability as well as the risk-benefit of blood product administration need to be weighed when considering therapeutic approaches to bleeding in cardiac surgical patients. In September 2005, a CME symposium jointly sponsored by the Dannemiller Memorial Educational Foundation and LMS Group and supported by an educational grant from Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation addressed hemostasis and blood management in cardiac surgical patients. That discussion of therapeutic and preventative approaches to these current issues is detailed in this volume, and has been updated to include current perspectives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransfusionSame topicCardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207