MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038249721 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.63.134417

Temperature evolution of the quantum gap in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cs</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ni</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2001· article· lv· W2038249721 on OpenAlexaff
M. Kenzelmann, R. A. Cowley, W. J. L. Buyers, D. F. McMorrow

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B, Condensed matter · 2001
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsRenormalizationCutoffExcitationScalingMass gapAntiferromagnetismCondensed matter physicsDispersion (optics)Quantum mechanicsMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neutron-scattering measurements on the one-dimensional gapped $S=1$ antiferromagnet, ${\mathrm{CsNiCl}}_{3},$ have shown that excitation corresponding to the Haldane mass gap $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ at low temperatures persists as a resonant feature to high temperatures. We find that the strong upward renormalization of the gap excitation, by a factor of three between 5 and 70 K, is more than enough to overcome its decreasing lifetime. We find that the gap lifetime is substantially shorter than that predicted by the scaling theory of Damle and Sachdev based on a classical dispersion for the Haldane excitations, but when we include their expected relativistic dispersion, the theory, in its low-temperature range of validity, gives a good account of experiment. The upward gap renormalization agrees with the nonlinear sigma model at low temperatures and even up to T of order $2\ensuremath{\Delta}$ provided an upper momentum cutoff is included.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B, Condensed matterSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207