MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038257532 · doi:10.1101/sqb.2001.66.293

The mRNA Closed-loop Model: The Function of PABP and PABP-interacting Proteins in mRNA Translation

2001· review· en· W2038257532 on OpenAlexafffund
Avak Kahvejian, Gilles Roy, Nahum Sonenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueCold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsTranslation (biology)Poly(A)-binding proteinMessenger RNAEukaryotic translationTranslational regulationCell biologyBiologyGene expressionGeneRegulation of gene expressionMolecular biologyChemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Translational control is an important means by whichcells govern gene expression. It provides a rapid responseto growth and proliferation stimuli and plays a role incontrolling feedback mechanisms in the cell. In systemswith little or no transcriptional control (e.g., reticulocytesand oocytes), translation is the predominant mode of regulation of gene expression (for review, see Mathews et al.2000). Initiation, the rate-limiting step of translation, isoften the target of translational control. All nuclear-transcribed eukaryotic mRNAs possess a 5′ cap (m7GpppN,where m is a methyl group and N is any nucleotide), andmost possess a 3′ poly(A) tail. The focus of this paper isthe role of the poly(A) tail and the poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) in translation initiation. Such an analysis requires a brief introduction of translation initiation and itscontrol...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations184
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative BiologySame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207