MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038283664 · doi:10.1577/t09-037.1

The Use of Acoustic Tags to Determine the Timing and Location of the Juvenile Coho Salmon Migration out of the Strait of Georgia, Canada

2009· article· en· W2038283664 on OpenAlexaffabout
C. M. Chittenden, Richard J. Beamish, C. M. Neville, R. M. Sweeting, R. S. McKinley

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Fisheries Society · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJuvenileOncorhynchusFisherySound (geography)Fish <Actinopterygii>PopulationGeographyOceanographyFish migrationBiologyEcologyGeologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The migration of juvenile coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch out of the Strait of Georgia in 2006 was investigated by means of acoustic telemetry. During July and September, 173 juvenile coho salmon were caught in the strait with a purse seine, surgically implanted with acoustic tags, and released the same day. In 2006, approximately 19% of the fish tagged in July and 52% of those tagged in September left the Strait of Georgia. Most of these fish did so in October and November through Juan de Fuca Strait and not by a northward migration through Queen Charlotte Strait. This movement was several months later than that observed for coho salmon migrating out of Puget Sound. A small number of coho salmon that moved out of the Strait of Georgia migrated south to areas off the coast of Washington and Oregon. The documentation of a movement out of the Strait of Georgia late in the year was important, as it shows that population changes of the juvenile coho salmon that enter the strait during spring and summer are a consequence of ecosystem‐related effects within the strait.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score0.824

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Fisheries SocietySame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207