Evaluation of a logarithmic-law strength rate parameter using full-flow penetrometers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relation between the strength law rate parameter and the observed rate effect from full-flow penetrometer soundings performed at different penetration velocities is discussed and examined herein through an analytical investigation. It is shown, using numerical results of steady-state (continuous) penetrations, that the shear strength and global penetration resistance follow a similar law in which the shear strength and penetration resistance increase linearly with the logarithm of shear strain and penetration velocity, respectively. However, the strain rate parameter that is associated with the in situ penetration is found to be different from the conventional laboratory-based strain rate factor when considering the logarithmic relation between strength and rate. Consequently, previous suggestions to estimate the laboratory-based strength rate parameter as equal to the in situ rate parameter can only be considered a first-order approximation. Analytical examination of the energy terms involved in the plasticity solution, under the relaxing assumption of a constant plastic flow field, has led to the development of a simplified expression that resulted in an in-situ-based rate parameter of µ/(1 + 5µ) (where µ is the conventional laboratory-based strength rate parameter). Comparison of the numerically derived values with the simplified analytical expression shows good agreement, suggesting that this relation may help establish the soil rate strength parameter from full-flow penetration tests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it