MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038324358 · doi:10.2310/7070.2005.34602

Effect of Sodium Thiosulphate and cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum on FADU Tumour Cells in Nude Mice

2005· article· en· W2038324358 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Norbert Viallet, Brian W. Blakley, Asher Begleiter, Marsha K. Leith

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Otolaryngology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemotherapy-induced organ toxicity mitigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalineMedicineNude mouseBasal cellCancer researchRatónPathologySodiumInternal medicineCancerChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (CDDP) on FADU squamous cell carcinoma cells in a nude mouse model and to determine the effect of sodium thiosulphate (STS) on CDDP activity. METHODS: CD1 nude mice were inoculated with FADU tumour cells to both flanks. They were then randomized to four treatment groups: control, CDDP only, STS only, or CDDP and STS. Tumour growth was measured using calipers and charted at 3-day intervals. RESULTS: Tumour volumes were calculated as an ellipsoid and charted against time. CONCLUSIONS: CDDP inhibited FADU tumour cell growth compared with saline controls (p < .005). The addition of STS did not inhibit the CDDP activity when compared with CDDP-alone activity (p = .989). Compared with saline control solution, STS alone also inhibited tumour growth significantly (p < .005).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of OtolaryngologySame topicChemotherapy-induced organ toxicity mitigationFrench-language works237,207