Hybrid Spatial Query Processing between a Server and a Wireless Sensor Network
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There has been much interest in a spatial query which acquires sensor readings from sensor nodes inside specified geographical area of interests. A centralized approach performs the spatial query at a server after acquiring all sensor readings. However, it incurs high wireless transmission cost in accessing all sensor nodes. Therefore, various in-network spatial search methods have been proposed, which focus on reducing the wireless transmission cost. However, the in-network methods sometimes incur unnecessary wireless transmissions because of dead space, which is spatially indexed but does not contain real data. In this paper, we propose a hybrid spatial query processing algorithm which removes the unnecessary wireless transmissions. The main idea of the hybrid algorithm is to find results of a spatial query at a server in advance and use the results in removing the unnecessary wireless transmissions at a sensor network. We compare the in-network method through several experiments and clarify our algorithm's remarkable features.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it