MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038357382 · doi:10.7202/042940ar

Qui contrôle la constitutionnalité des lois, les cours supérieures ou les tribunaux administratifs?

2005· article· fr· W2038357382 on OpenAlex
Patrice Garant

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers de droit · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal Politics and Economy
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'art. 52 de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1982 consacre la suprématie de la Constitution, dont fait partie la Charte, mais ne dit pas qui statuera sur la validité des lois inconstitutionnelles ou contraires à cette Charte. Le contrôle de la constitutionnalité appartient-il en exclusivité aux cours supérieures, héritières des cours royales de common law, ou à tout tribunal inférieur, y compris les tribunaux administratifs de toute catégorie. La question est actuellement débattue devant la Cour fédérale d'appel. Il existe deux thèses qui s'opposent. Il importe de les étudier à la lumière des principes fondamentaux de notre droit constitutionnel, notamment celui de la séparation des pouvoirs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it