MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038365841 · doi:10.1063/1.2969909

Equation of state for diamond in wide ranges of pressure and temperature

2008· article· en· W2038365841 on OpenAlexaff
John S. Tse, W. B. Holzapfel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDebye modelAnharmonicityPhononDiamondThermodynamicsMelting curve analysisAtmospheric temperature rangeMelting temperatureEquation of stateCondensed matter physicsMaterials scienceAmbient pressureVolume (thermodynamics)Range (aeronautics)DebyeDiamond anvil cellChemistryPhysicsHigh pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Theoretical total energy and phonon calculations for diamond under strong compressions up to 3 TPa are analyzed with different analytical forms for the representation of p-V isotherms. A simple model with only two characteristic (volume dependent) phonon parameters—an effect acoustic Debye temperature and an additional Einstein temperature of the optical phonons—provides a complete modeling of all the thermophysical properties of diamond in this extended range of pressure up to the melting curve. The comparison with thermophysical data at ambient pressure provides additional information on weak intrinsic anharmonic contributions and gives the frame for the complete modeling up to 3 TPa in pressure and temperatures up to the melting curve.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207