MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038385100 · doi:10.1063/1.1763191

Three-dimensionalization of freely-decaying two-dimensional turbulence

2004· article· en· W2038385100 on OpenAlexafffund
K. Ngan, David Straub, Peter Bartello

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
KeywordsPhysicsTurbulenceInstabilityAdvectionPerturbation (astronomy)Growth rateClassical mechanicsFlow (mathematics)MechanicsPressure gradientZonal flow (plasma)Statistical physicsGeometryThermodynamicsMathematicsPlasma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The three-dimensionalization of freely-decaying two-dimensional turbulence is studied numerically. Using two different basic states, it is shown that the hyperbolic instability of steady mixing layers generalizes to unsteady flow. The growth of three-dimensional (3D) perturbations is interpreted in terms of a “pressureless” analysis in which horizontal pressure gradients are neglected and the underlying physical mechanism is advective in nature. For a steady, pressureless base flow the (asymptotic) growth rate is exactly determined, in a few special cases, by variants of the so-called Weiss criterion; more generally, local growth rate estimates are obtained. For freely-decaying two-dimensional turbulence there is analogous behavior: while the 3D perturbation remains small the pressureless approximation holds at large horizontal scales and local growth rate estimates apply. The pressureless modes have a determining influence on the growth (the damping effect of the horizontal pressure gradient is small).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.645

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207