MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038410467 · doi:10.2523/iptc-11257-ms

Understanding of the Fluid Flow Mechanism in Porous Media of EOR by ASP Flooding from Physical Modeling

2007· article· en· W2038410467 on OpenAlex
Jialu Wang, Shiyi Yuan, Pingping Shen, Taixian Zhong, Xu Jia

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Petroleum Technology Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnhanced oil recoveryPetroleum engineeringPorous mediumPermeability (electromagnetism)Saturation (graph theory)Relative permeabilityOil fieldReservoir simulationEnvironmental sciencePorosityMaterials scienceGeologyGeotechnical engineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The fluid flow mechanism in porous media of enhanced oil recovery by Alkli/ Surfactant/ Polymer (ASP) flooding is investigated by measuring production performance, pressure distribution and saturation distribution through installing differential pressure transducers and saturation measuring probes in a physical model of vertical heterogeneous reservoir. The fluid flow variation in reservoir is the main reason of enhanced oil recovery of ASP flooding, while the pressure field and saturation field are nonlinearly coupled together and the interaction between them results in the fluid flow variation in the reservoir. In a vertical heterogeneous reservoir, the ASP agents initially flow in high permeability layer, and fluid changes the flow direction toward low and middle permeability layers because the resistance in high permeability layer is increased under the physical and chemical action of adsorption, retention and emulsion etc. ASP flooding not only displaces out the residual oil in high permeability layer, but also displaces out the remaining oil in low and middle permeability layers by both increasing swept volume and displacing efficiency. Introduction Nowadays, most oil fields in China are in the production later period, and the water cut increases rapidly with even over 80 percent. It is hard for water flooding technique to meet the needs of oil fields production. Thus it is inevitable to develop new oil production techniques to replace water flooding. ASP flooding is a new technique which is developed out on the basis of alkali flooding, surfactant flooding and polymer flooding in the late 1980s. ASP flooding synthetically make use of the benefits of the above three flooding methods, and oil recovery is enhanced greatly by decreasing interfacial tension, increasing capillary number, enhancing microscopic displacing efficiency, improving mobility ration and increasing macroscopic sweeping efficiency.[1] In recent years, many intensive and deep researches have been done on ASP flooding both in China and in the world, some important achievements and recognition have been obtained, which lays the solid base for the practical application in oil fields[2–4]. The ASP flooding mechanism was studied visually by using microscopic scale model and double plane glass model with sand in reference[5–6]. In these experiments, the water viscosity finger, the residue oil distribution after water flooding and the oil bank formed by microscopic emulsion flooding were observed. In reference [7–8], it was observed that the main mechanism of ASP flooding are deformation, threading, emulsion(O/W) and strapping are the main mechanisms of ASP flooding in water-wetting reservoir, and that the main mechanism of ASP flooding are interface producing, bridging between inner-pore and outer-pore, emulsion(O/W) in oil-wetting reservoir. In a vertical heterogeneous reservoir, ASP flooding increases displacing efficiency by displacing residual oil through decreasing interfacial tension, simultaneously improves sweeping efficiency by extending the swept area both in vertical and plane direction. Some physical and chemical phenomena such as emulsion, scale deposition, chromatographic separation are occurred in the process of ASP flooding[9–10]. Many very complicated physical chemistry fluid flow in porous media are involved in ASP flooding, there still remain a lot of oil recovery mechanisms needing to be solved. By far, most researches have been done on microscopic displacement mechanism of ASP flooding, while the fluid flow mechanism in porous media in macroscopic scale lacks sufficient studies. In this research, a vertical heterogeneous reservoir model is established, and differential pressure transducers and saturation measuring probes are installed on the model. The fluid flow mechanism of increasing both macroscopic sweeping efficiency and microscopic displacing efficiency is studied by measuring production performance and the variation of pressure distribution and saturation distribution in ASP flooding. An experimental data base of ASP flooding is set up, and the data provide the experimental base for numerical simulation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score0.570

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it