Bibliographic record
Abstract
The centenary of Oscar Wilde 's t897 release from prison saw an explosion of drama and film that marched the playwright from professional and romantic glory to inexorable ruin. During the late spring and summer of 1998, New York theatre-goers had their pick of Wildean diaspora. At the West Village's Minetta Lane Theatre, Moises Kaufman had already spent more than a year putting Wilde through his juridical paces in Gross Indecency: The Three Trials of Oscar Wilde (1997). Uptown at Broadway's Broadhurst Theatre, film buffs could ogle a thoroughly butch Wilde in the person of Liam Neeson, mouthing the suicidal inventions of David Hare's The Judas Kiss (1998). Wildeophiles on a budget could catch Stephen Fry's star-making tum in Brian Gilbert's film Wilde (1998).' And any Yank who had missed the London premiere of Tom Stoppard's The Invention of Love (1997), in which a shattered Wilde carpe diems A.E. Housman on the River Styx, had only to await the play's transfer to Lincoln Center and Broadway's Lyceum Theatre (2001 ).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.047 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".