MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038419015 · doi:10.1109/icdsp.2013.6622795

Enhanced FBLMS algorithm for ECG and noise removal from semg signals

2013· article· en· W2038419015 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohamed El Fares Djellatou, François Nougarou, Daniel Massicotte

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAlgorithmBlock (permutation group theory)Noise (video)Active noise controlComputer scienceRecursive least squares filterDistortion (music)Least mean squares filterAdaptive filterDetectorNoise measurementLeast-squares function approximationPattern recognition (psychology)Noise reductionArtificial intelligenceMathematicsStatisticsBandwidth (computing)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we proposed a Dual-adapted Fast Block Least Mean Squares algorithm (DA-FBLMS) to remove electrocardiogram (ECG) and noise contaminations from surface electromyography signals (sEMG). Based on an adaptive noise cancelation (ANC) structure and artificial input signals, the ANC integrated proposed algorithm distinguishes itself by the use of an iterative method characterized by a varying number of updates for every different input block, combined with an adaptive step size guided by a QRS detector and the average error of the corresponding input block. The simulations demonstrate that the proposed DA-FBLMS algorithm presents better performances during the contaminations cancellation compared to a recursive least squares algorithm (RLS) and classic FBLMS algorithm, especially in noisy and high distortion environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207