MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038443941 · doi:10.1515/zac.2006.020

A Note on the Term <i>Homoioousios</i>

2006· article· de· W2038443941 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für Antikes Christentum / Journal of Ancient Christianity · 2006
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicByzantine Studies and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zusammenfassung Der Artikel analysiert die Quellen für die Annahme einer homöusianischen Partei im Trinitarischen Streit des 4. Jahrhunderts. Hierfür ist besonders zu beachten, daß das Wort (mit doppeltem Omikron, parallel zu einer lateinischen Umschreibung homoeousios ) erst im Sommer 358 erfunden wurde (nicht schon 355 oder 356), nur wenige Jahre lang benutzt wurde, bevor es sehr bald verschwand. Dies läßt sich anhand von Hilarius und Marius Victorinus erkennen, besonders aber am kompletten Fehlen des Wortes bei den Kappadokiern. Anderslautende Nachrichten in der Kirchengeschichte des Sozomenus sind hingegen nicht vertrauenswürdig.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it