La mutation organisationnelle de la Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec : analyse du discours éditorial sous l’ère H.-P. Rousseau (2002-2008)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les pertes historiques de 40 milliards de dollars qu’a connues la Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec (CDPQ) en 2008 se sont produites dans le contexte de changements constitutifs pour ce symbole de la Révolution tranquille. Cet article soutient que ces changements s’inscrivent dans un processus de mutation organisationnelle qui découle de l’application des principes de la nouvelle gestion publique (NGP) et de la marginalisation du rôle de la CDPQ dans le développement économique du Québec. Notre analyse révèle que le discours éditorialiste a adhéré aux principes de la législation actuelle et à la nouvelle vision organisationnelle qui y est associée. La mutation organisationnelle de la CDPQ et son mandat actuel reçurent ainsi une approbation de principe du discours éditorial au cours de la période de la présidence d’Henri-Paul Rousseau (2002-2008).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".