MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038461049 · doi:10.1080/10196780500083761

The Assimilation of E‐business in Manufacturing SMEs: Determinants and Effects on Growth and Internationalization

2005· article· en· W2038461049 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Louis Raymond, François Bergeron, Sam Blili

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Markets · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovation and Knowledge Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsBusinessInternationalizationIndustrial organizationElectronic businessThe InternetContext (archaeology)Order (exchange)Small and medium-sized enterprisesCommerceMarketingBusiness modelFinanceInternational trade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to become ‘world‐class’ enterprises, manufacturing SMEs have made sizable investments in Internet‐related technologies as the infrastructure for e‐business applications. To the extent that e‐business is assimilated by the SME, it can significantly affect the firm's key business processes and relationships such as servicing customers and collaborating with business partners. In this regard, an empirical study of 108 Canadian firms sought to answer the following questions: For what purposes are the Internet and the Web presently used, i.e., to what extent are e‐business functions assimilated in manufacturing SMEs? What characteristics of the SMEs' environmental, strategic, managerial, operational and technological context determine e‐business assimilation? And ultimately, to what extent does e‐business assimilation contribute to the growth and internationalization of manufacturing SMEs?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations183
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronic MarketsSame topicInnovation and Knowledge ManagementFrench-language works237,207