MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038470952 · doi:10.1080/10705422.2014.901266

Intersectoral Co-construction of a Community-Based Workshop for Respectful Sharing of Public Transportation

2014· article· en· W2038470952 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Community Practice · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Policy Implementation Science
Canadian institutionsCentre de Santé et de Services Sociaux CavendishSanté MontérégieInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgency (philosophy)Public relationsProcess (computing)Public healthBusinessCommunity organizationPolitical scienceEconomic growthSociologyNursingMedicineEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Challenges of seniors’ use of public transportation and efforts to minimize them call upon intersectoral action. A seniors’ community group partnered with a local health agency to develop an intergenerational workshop aiming to promote respectful sharing of public transportation among teenagers. This article describes the steps of an intersectoral and interdisciplinary co-construction process in which high schools, a local health agency, the transportation sector, academia and seniors’ community organizations collaborated. This led to the development of a workshop that was both feasible and appreciated by the main stakeholders. Lessons learned from this collaborative process for developing intersectoral community-based initiatives are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.695
GPT teacher head0.661
Teacher spread0.034 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it