MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038494487 · doi:10.1287/opre.2013.1254

Scheduled Service Network Design for Freight Rail Transportation

2014· article· en· W2038494487 on OpenAlexaff
Endong Zhu, Teodor Gabriel Crainic, Michel Gendreau

Bibliographic record

VenueOperations Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Ports and Logistics
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Operations researchService qualityService (business)Transport engineeringMathematical optimizationEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the scheduled service network design problem for freight rail transportation. The proposed model integrates service selection and scheduling, car classification and blocking, train makeup, and routing of time-dependent customer shipments based on a cyclic three-layer space–time network representation of the associated operations and decisions and their relations and time dimensions. This paper also proposes a matheuristic solution methodology integrating slope scaling, a dynamic block-generation mechanism, long-term-memory-based perturbation strategies, and ellipsoidal search, a new intensification mechanism to thoroughly explore very large neighborhoods of elite solutions restricted using information from the history of the search. Experimental results show that the proposed solution method is efficient and robust, yielding high-quality solutions for realistically sized problem instances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations146
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOperations ResearchSame topicMaritime Ports and LogisticsFrench-language works237,207