MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038496223 · doi:10.1063/1.1614877

Fiber-loop ring-down spectroscopy: A sensitive absorption technique for small liquid samples

2003· article· en· W2038496223 on OpenAlexaff
Zhaoguo Tong, Michael B. Jakubinek, Alexander Wright, Alison Gillies, Hans‐Peter Loock

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceOpticsCavity ring-down spectroscopyOptical fiberFiberSpectroscopyFiber optic sensorAbsorption (acoustics)Polarization-maintaining optical fiberDispersion-shifted fiberAbsorption spectroscopyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cavity ring-down spectroscopy has proven to be a very sensitive gas-phase spectroscopic technique, suitable to record either very weak transitions of abundant gases or stronger transitions of trace gases. Here, an adaptation of the ring-down measurement principle to optical waveguides is presented. Fiber-loop ring-down spectroscopy (FLRDS) allows for the measurement of absorption spectra of minute quantities of liquid solutions. An optical fiber is wound into a loop using a fiber splice connector. A nanosecond laser light pulse (λ∼810 nm) is coupled into the loop and the light pulses are detected using a photomultiplier detector. It is found that once the light is coupled into the fiber it experiences very little loss and the light pulses do a large number of round trips before their intensity is below the detection threshold. The characteristic ring-down time is obtained by exponential fitting of the envelope of the wave form. This method is well suited to characterize low-loss processes in fiber optic transmission independent from power fluctuations of the light source. The strengths of the technique are demonstrated by characterization of a variety of loss processes—in particular by the measurement of the absolute loss of the optical fiber and of the fiber connector, losses due to macrobending of a section of the fiber loop, as well as losses due to lateral and longitudinal displacement in the fiber–fiber connection. Furthermore, it is shown that FLRDS is useful as an absorption spectroscopic technique for very small sample volumes and may be applied as an absorption detection method in analytical chemistry devices. A crude 47 μm channel in polydimethylsiloxane polymer was fabricated between the fiber end facets and the dye 1,1′-diethyl-4,4′-dicarbocyanine iodide (DDCI) was introduced into the channel. From the concentration dependence of ring-down time the sample volume was determined as 700 pL and the detection limit as about 10−10 mol, or 7×10−8 g of DDCI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations85
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Scientific InstrumentsSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207