MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dermal fibroblasts from different layers of human skin are heterogeneous in expression of collagenase and types I and III procollagen mRNA

2004· article· en· W2038497050 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWound Repair and Regeneration · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWound Healing and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institute of General Medical Sciences
KeywordsNerve growth factorWound healingMedicineSalineInflammationCollagenaseInternal medicineEndocrinologyAndrologySurgeryChemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have previously shown that the expression of collagenase mRNA and activity are suppressed in fibroblasts derived from postburn hypertrophic scar. Although it is known that differential synthesis of collagen and collagenase in postburn hypertrophic scar is one of the main reasons for the excessive accumulation of collagen, it is not clear why the expression of collagenase in hypertrophic scar fibroblasts is suppressed relative to that in normal fibroblasts. In this study, we hypothesized that dermal fibroblasts from deeper layers of skin, which normally migrate toward the wound site, have a different capacity to express key extracellular matrix proteins such as collagenase and types I and III procollagen. To test this hypothesis, we established four different pairs of hypertrophic and site-matched normal cell strains from four different patients with postburn hypertrophic scarring. In another set of experiments, ten different cell strains from two normal human skin samples that were horizontally sectioned into five different layers (layers 1-5 correspond to upper to deeper layers, respectively) were established in culture. Cells at the same passages were harvested, total RNA was extracted, and Northern analysis was conducted to determine the level of collagenase and types I and III procollagen mRNA expression in each cell strain. The results of Northern blot analysis showed two transcripts each for the pro alpha1(I) collagen chain (5.8 and 4.8 kb) and for the pro alpha1(III) collagen chain (5.4 and 4.8 kb) in all cell strains examined. The intensity of the pro alpha1(I) chain of type I procollagen mRNA varied, ranging from 50.8 to 137.1 and 44.4 to 131.5 densitometry units among either normal or hypertrophic scar cells examined, respectively. Similarly, the relative quantity of type III procollagen transcript also varied, ranging from 10.4 to 91.1 and 28.7 to 116.1 among normal and hypertrophic scar cells, respectively. When five different skin layers from each tissue sample were evaluated for functional cell heterogeneity, the results showed a marked variation in expression of mRNA for type I and III procollagen. Although the level of collagenase mRNA also varied among different cell strains examined, the expression of collagenase mRNA was lower in fibroblasts derived from deeper layers of each skin sample. In conclusion, cells from different layers of normal skin samples are heterogeneous in their constitutive expression of some key extracellular matrix components such as collagenase and types I and III procollagen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it