MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038567933 · doi:10.3917/mult.056.0203

Actions multitudinaires et interpellations plébéiennes : un même combat ?

2014· article· fr· W2038567933 on OpenAlexaff
José Antonio Giménez Micó

Bibliographic record

VenueMultitudes · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitics and Society in Latin America
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMultitudePolitical sciencePhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce travail explore la possibilité d’articuler les notions de « multitude », « pouvoir constituant » et « interpellation plébéienne » dans une structure conceptuelle commune laquelle, sans chercher à gommer leurs différences, soit capable de mieux saisir les changements à l’ordre institué provoqués par les mobilisations que plusieurs pays de l’Amérique latine connaissent depuis quelques années.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.033
Scholarly communication0.0110.011
Open science0.0010.011
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMultitudesSame topicPolitics and Society in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207