Unfolder lens injection system with acrylic intraocular lenses: Retrospective study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the efficacy of using the Unfolder Sapphire series system (Allergan) for implanting acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) with a 6.0 mm optic (Sensar AR40, Allergan). SETTING: Ambulatory day-surgery center. METHODS: Phacoemulsification was performed using topical anesthesia. The Unfolder injection system was used to insert a Sensar AR40 acrylic IOL. Data on complications and the success of implantation were collected retrospectively. RESULTS: Two hundred two consecutive patients having implantation of the Sensar IOL with the Unfolder system were examined. Three problems related to the Unfolder injector were identified. Another patient required an anterior vitrectomy, sulcus IOL implantation with the Unfolder, and optic capture; the complication was not related to the Unfolder system. Sulcus implantation was relatively easy with the Unfolder. CONCLUSION: Implantation of the Sensar AR40 IOL with the Unfolder system was easy to perform, and no serious complications occurred.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".