MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038594258 · doi:10.1109/icci-cc.2014.6921445

Rank level fusion of multimodal cancelable biometrics

2014· article· en· W2038594258 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBiometric Identification and Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiometricsRandom projectionComputer scienceRank (graph theory)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceProjection (relational algebra)Authentication (law)Face (sociological concept)Feature (linguistics)Random forestData miningMathematicsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cancelable biometrics is newly emerged biometric technology that can provide the protection over different attacks to a biometric system. In this paper, we have presented a multilevel random projection on face and ear biometric traits. The multiple random projections are conducted using multiple random projection matrixes. From multiple random projections, we have generated multiple templates for biometric authentication. Therefore, proposed method can provide better template security and better feature quality. Multiple cancelable templates are used for recognition purpose and rank level fusion is applied to generate final decision from multiple ranks. As per our knowledge, we have applied rank level fusion on cancelable multimodal biometric system for the first time. A detailed validation and the performance analysis of the proposed algorithm on a virtual multimodal cancelable face and ear database are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiometric Identification and SecurityFrench-language works237,207