Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inceste : la contagion épidémique du silence La littérature traitant de cas d’inceste, soit des abus sexuels commis sur des enfants dans la famille, a depuis longtemps mis en évidence la place centrale du silence qui entoure ces situations d’agressions répétées. Cet article réexamine cette thématique en explorant la dynamique du silence autour de l’inceste, et qui le perpétue dans la vie quotidienne de ses acteurs. J’aborderai cette exploration sous trois angles d’observation. D’abord, celui d’enfants violés devenus adultes, pour lesquels, la question du « dire » constitue une thématique à la fois centrale et douloureuse. Ensuite, celui des anthropologues, dans la mesure où en tant que spécialistes de la formulation des règles sociales et théoriciens de l’interdit de l’inceste, ils sont des acteurs sociaux particuliers dont il est intéressant d’interroger le discours sur l’inceste. Enfin, sous l’angle collectif, celui de la société, à l’heure où l’inceste marque régulièrement l’actualité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".