MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038600089 · doi:10.1139/t01-087

An equation of state for unsaturated soils

2002· article· en· W2038600089 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Edward J. Murray

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerzaghi's principleSoil waterEnthalpyEquation of stateEffective stressGeotechnical engineeringThermodynamicsSaturation (graph theory)ChemistryGeologySoil scienceMathematicsPore water pressurePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The enthalpy within a soil system under equilibrium conditions is investigated theoretically. Terzaghi's effective stress equation for a saturated soil is first examined and the approach extended to determine the enthalpy associated with the air, water, and solid phases, and the interactions between the phases, in an unsaturated soil. An equation of state is developed which links the stress state variables (p – ua) and (ua– uw) to the specific volume (v) and specific water volume (vw) and thus to the volumes of the phases. The equation is shown to provide a logical interpretation of the average volumetric "coupling" stress p'cwithin unsaturated soils which highlights the significance of the dual stress regime and bimodal structure. The new equation is compared with previously reported experimental data on kaolin and a lateritic gravel. The agreement is good and it provides insight into unsaturated soil strength and deformation behaviour and clarifies various previously identified anomalies.Key words: partial saturation, unsaturated soils, thermodynamics, effective stress, equation of state, critical state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207