Mg2+ and Ca2+ Differentially Regulate DNA Binding and Dimerization of DREAM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DREAM (calsenilin/KChIP3) is an EF-hand calcium-binding protein that represses transcription of prodynorphin and c-fos genes. Here we present structural and binding studies on single-site mutants of DREAM designed to disable Ca(2+) binding to each of the functional EF-hands (EF-2: D150N; EF-3: E186Q; and EF-4: E234Q). Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) analysis of Ca(2+) binding to the various mutants revealed that, in the absence of Mg(2+), Ca(2+) binds independently and sequentially to EF-3 (DeltaH = -2.4 kcal/mol), EF-4 (DeltaH = +5.2 kcal/mol), and EF-2 (DeltaH = +1 kcal/mol). By contrast, only two Ca(2+) bind to DREAM in the presence of physiological levels of Mg(2+) for both wild-type and D150N, suggesting that EF-2 binds constitutively to Mg(2+). ITC measurements demonstrate that one Mg(2+) binds enthalpically with high affinity (K(d) = 13 mum and DeltaH = -0.79 kcal/mol) and two or more Mg(2+) bind entropically in the millimolar range. Size-exclusion chromatography studies revealed that Mg(2+) stabilizes DREAM as a monomer, whereas Ca(2+) induces protein dimerization. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays indicated that Mg(2+) is essential for sequence-specific binding of DREAM to DNA response elements (DREs) in prodynorphin and c-fos genes. The EF-hand mutants bind specifically to DRE, suggesting they are functionally intact. None of the EF-hand mutants bind DRE at saturating Ca(2+) levels, suggesting that binding of a single Ca(2+) at either EF-3 or EF-4 is sufficient to drive conformational changes that abolish DNA binding. NMR structural analysis indicates that metal-free DREAM adopts a folded yet flexible molten globule-like structure. Both Ca(2+) and Mg(2+) induce distinct conformational changes, which stabilize tertiary structure of DREAM. We propose that Mg(2+) binding at EF-2 may structurally bridge DREAM to DNA targets and that Ca(2+)-induced protein dimerization disrupts DNA binding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".