MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038740227 · doi:10.1021/om060284h

Structure and Dynamics of a Compressed Dihydride Complex of Osmium

2006· article· en· W2038740227 on OpenAlexaff
Nils Schloerer, Vincent Pons, Dmitry G. Gusev, D. Michael Heinekey

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganometallics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryOsmiumRelaxation (psychology)HydrideDihydrogen complexSpectral lineLigand (biochemistry)NMR spectra databaseMetalProton NMRCrystallographyCarbon-13 NMR satelliteResonance (particle physics)Rotation (mathematics)Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyStereochemistryRutheniumFluorine-19 NMRAtomic physicsOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The complex OsCl(NH C(Ph)C 6 H 4 )(P i Pr 3 ) 2 (H 2 ) ( 1 ) has been characterized by Esteruelas and co-workers ( Organometallics 1998, 17, 4065−4076) as an elongated dihydrogen complex based on relaxation time measurements and observation of J H - D = 6.3 Hz in 1 - d 1 . Variable-temperature NMR studies were reported in which the single hydride resonance observed at ambient temperature decoalesced into two signals at low temperature (193 K), which was attributed to hindered rotation of the bound H 2 ligand. Reinvestigation of the low-temperature NMR spectra of 1 reveals a more complex situation. Examination of the 1 H and 31 P NMR spectra of 1 and 1 - d 1 at lower temperatures than previously studied demonstrates that quantum mechanical exchange coupling is observed between the metal-bonded hydrogen atoms. This coupling is quenched in 1 - d 1 . Hindered rotation around Os−P bonds in 1 also contributes to the observed NMR spectra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganometallicsSame topicAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207