Revue de la biologie et de la production du ginseng à cinq folioles (<i>Panax quinquefolius</i> L.) en milieu forestier au Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La racine du ginseng a cinq folioles, une plante originaire des forets de feuillus de l'est de l'Amerique du Nord, est tres recherchee sur le marche asiatique en raison de ses diverses proprietes medicinales. Les populations naturelles de l'espece etant aujourd'hui menacees, l'approvisionnement des consommateurs repose essentiellement sur la culture. La presque totalite du ginseng a cinq folioles est produite en champ, a tres forte densite, sous des structures d'ombrage. Au cours des dernieres annees, toutefois, de plus en plus de producteurs ont commence a produire cette espece en milieu forestier, ou les arbres jouent notamment le role de procurer l'ombrage necessaire aux plants. Ce mode de culture, moins couteux, permet d'obtenir des racines de qualite superieure et de valeur commerciale beaucoup plus elevee. Des travaux d'amenagement forestier permettent d'assurer une intensite lumineuse adequate. La litiere de feuilles limite les risques de gel des racines. Un sol meuble, bien draine, possedant un pH legerement acide ou pres de la neutralite et une bonne teneur en calcium permet d'ameliorer le rendement et le taux de survie des plants. La protection des populations naturelles est cependant primordiale pour preserver une richesse genetique essentielle au succes futur de la production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".