Effect of Day and Time of Admission on Mortality in an Intensive Care Unit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Variations in outcome relating to out-of-hours care have received considerable attention. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to determine the effect of day and time of admission on mortality in an intensive care unit (ICU) with representative admission severity of illness. Data pertaining to 4,183 patients admitted between 2000 and 2007 were extracted from a prospectively maintained database. Case-mix adjustment was undertaken using the UK APACHE II probability of hospital death. The mean APACHE score was 20.9 with a median predicted hospital mortality of 32.5%. Actual hospital mortality was 30.8%. Compared with Wednesdays as the reference day, admission to ICU on any other given day was not associated with higher crude or case-mix adjusted mortality. Admission to ICU in the evening, compared with daytime admission, was associated with lower odds of crude hospital mortality, but this difference was no longer significant after case-mix adjustment. Case-mix adjusted in-hospital mortality does not vary with day and time of admission, even in patients with higher severity of illness and higher predicted mortality than previously reported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".