MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038770474 · doi:10.1145/1277548.1277575

A sparse modular GCD algorithm for polynomials over algebraic function fields

2007· article· en· W2038770474 on OpenAlex
Seyed Mohammad Mahdi Javadi, Michael Monagan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPolynomial and algebraic computation
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmGreatest common divisorAlgebraic numberField (mathematics)Las vegasModular designFunction (biology)MathematicsComputer scienceAlgebraic functionModular arithmeticDivisor (algebraic geometry)Sparse matrixDiscrete mathematicsPure mathematicsPhysicsCryptography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a first sparse modular algorithm for computing a greatest common divisor of two polynomials f1, f2 ε L[x] where L is an algebraic function field in k ≥ 0 parameters with r ≥ 0 field extensions. Our algorithm extends the dense algorithm of Monagan and van Hoeij from 2004 to support multiple field extensions and to be efficient when the gcd is sparse. Our algorithm is an output sensitive Las Vegas algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPolynomial and algebraic computationFrench-language works237,207