MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038782842 · doi:10.1190/1.2952571

Bayesian wavefield separation by transform-domain sparsity promotion

2008· article· en· W2038782842 on OpenAlexafffund
Deli Wang, Rayan Saab, Özgür Yılmaz, Felix J. Herrmann

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Advanced Education
KeywordsCurveletDomain (mathematical analysis)Computer scienceAlgorithmBayesian probabilityClutterIndependence (probability theory)SIGNAL (programming language)Energy (signal processing)Noise (video)Blind signal separationAmplitudePhase (matter)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceWaveletMathematicsImage (mathematics)StatisticsWavelet transformRadarPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Successful removal of coherent-noise sources greatly determines seismic imaging quality. Major advances have been made in this direction, e.g., surface-related multiple elimination (SRME) and interferometric ground-roll removal. Still, moderate phase, timing, amplitude errors, and clutter in predicted signal components can be detrimental. Adopting a Bayesian approach, along with assuming approximate curvelet-domain independence of the to-be-separated signal components, we construct an iterative algorithm that takes predictions produced by, for example, SRME as input and separates these components in a robust manner. In addition, the proposed algorithm controls the energy mismatch between separated and predicted components. Such a control, lacking in earlier curvelet-domain formulations, improves results for primary-multiple separation on synthetic and real data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207