MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038800153 · doi:10.2118/170045-ms

An Innovative Modeling Approach to Unveil Flow Control Devices' Potential in SAGD Application

2014· article· en· W2038800153 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Heavy Oil Conference-Canada · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)
FundersConocoPhillips
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringWellboreSteam-assisted gravity drainageSteam injectionFlow (mathematics)FlashingReservoir simulationFlow control (data)Production (economics)Computer scienceEngineeringProcess engineeringSimulationOil sandsMaterials scienceMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Sand screens with flow control devices (FCDs) have demonstrated significant potential in improving recovery in a Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) well pair. The premium wire-mesh sand control screens would have the capability to prevent sand flow into the liner in the event of a steam break-through. In addition the FCDs would improve steam conformance along the wellbore in the early time, and allow the producers to achieve higher production and lower Steam to Oil Ratios as well as restricting steam production if and when breakthrough at the producer occurred. To better understand FCD behavior in SAGD operations, modeling of the different FCD designs has been attempted and has shown that steam breakthrough can be more effectively controlled utilizing devices that promote water flashing as fluids pass through them. With tools providing this type of control, steam breakthroughs in the producer can be more effectively restricted resulting in a better-produced fluid distribution along the wellbore. This also allows the producers to be operated with lower subcool margins without fear of sand production and the potential liner damage. In order to validate the theory of improved performance and better thermal efficiency, a wellbore model coupled to a thermal reservoir simulator has been enhanced to more accurately model the impact of flow control devices on the reservoir/well performance. A collaborative effort has been initiated with the Computer Modeling Group (CMG) to develop a reservoir simulated FCD solution that will allow the user to enter characteristic performance curves for a variety of FCDs. The development of the new keyword associated with ConocoPhillips FCD's mechanistic modeling has shown to be an improvement to the way that FCDs are currently modeled helping to unveil their potential for in SAGD and thermal recovery applications. Results from FCD pressure loss predictions and modeling of FCDs in the reservoir are provided to demonstrate the benefits of FCD use in SAGD operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it