MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038803375 · doi:10.1093/spp/37.8.638

The case against growth

2010· article· en· W2038803375 on OpenAlex
S. Mendritzki

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience and Public Policy · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary sciencePolitical scienceMedia studiesSociologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article The case against growth Get access Managing Without Growth: Slower by Design, Not Disaster by Victor Peter A Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA, 2008, 272US$28.00 (paperback), 9781848442054. Stefan Mendritzki Stefan Mendritzki Interdisciplinary Graduate Program, University of Calgary, PF 3168, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Canada T2N 1N4; Email: semendri@ucalgary.ca Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Science and Public Policy, Volume 37, Issue 8, October 2010, Pages 638–640, https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/37.8.638 Published: 01 October 2010

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it