MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038806915 · doi:10.1117/12.421120

<title>Combination of fuzzy sets and Dempster-Shafer theories in forest map updating using multispectral data</title>

2001· article· en· W2038806915 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDempster–Shafer theoryComputer scienceMultispectral imageFuzzy setContext (archaeology)Class (philosophy)ConfusionFuzzy logicObject (grammar)Artificial intelligenceSensor fusionSet (abstract data type)Data miningData setGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explains a new approach to change detection and interpretation in a context of forest map updating. In this temporal change analysis we use data set composed of map at time T<SUB>0</SUB> and a satellite image at time T<SUB>1</SUB> and we refer to this as a mixed fusion approach. The analysis of remotely sensed data always necessitates the use of approximate reasoning. For this purpose, we use fuzzy logic to evaluate the objects' membership values to the considered classes and the Dempster-Shafer theory to analyze the confusion between the classes and to find the more evident class to which an object belongs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it