MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038809931 · doi:10.1117/12.628224

Effects of amplified spontaneous emission noise of optical amplifiers on the phase noise of optically generated electrical signals

2005· article· en· W2038809931 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical amplifierAmplified spontaneous emissionAmplifierSIGNAL (programming language)Noise (video)Stimulated emissionRadio over fiberMaterials scienceTransmission (telecommunications)Optical fiberOptoelectronicsPhase noiseOpticsPhysicsTelecommunicationsComputer scienceLaserCMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The applications of optical amplifiers such as erbium-doped fiber amplifiers (EDFAs) and semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOAs) are inevitable in most optical transmission links. These optical amplifiers employed in a transmission link will provide amplification to the optical signals to be transmitted, at the same time the amplifiers will also add amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) noise to the amplified optical signals. In radio-over-fiber systems, optical links are used to distribute high quality radio frequency (RF) signal, microwave signal or millimeter-wave (mm-wave) signal over optical fiber for low loss long-distant transmission. In this paper, the effects of amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) noise of optical amplifiers on the quality of the optically generated electrical signals are theoretically studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it