Mechanism of the Positive Inotropic Effect of Lysophosphatidic Acid in Rat Heart
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lysophosphatidic acid, a bioactive phospholipid, is mainly released from the activated platelets. The concentration of lysophosphatidic acid in serum is elevated under conditions such as ischemia, hypertension, and thrombosis; however, its effect on cardiac function, as well as the mechanisms of its action, have not been fully understood. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cardiovascular effects of lysophosphatidic acid were studied in vivo in rats as well as in vitro by using the isolated perfused heart and cardiomyocyte preparations. Intravenous injection of lysophosphatidic acid (2.8 to 14 microg/100 g body wt) increased the left ventricular systolic and diastolic pressures, rate of pressure development, and rate of pressure decay in rats. The positive inotropic effect of lysophosphatidic acid in vivo was not affected by the blockers of angiotensin II, endothelin-1, or adrenergic receptors, but this action was abolished by pretreatment with neurokinin type 1 receptor antagonist (L703606) as well as Ca2+-channel antagonist (verapamil). In the isolated heart, lysophosphatidic acid (1-10 microM) had no significant effect on cardiac function but higher concentrations (20-50 microM) elevated the left ventricular end diastolic pressure, significantly. Lysophosphatidic acid (1-30 microM) neither showed any effect on the basal intracellular concentration of free Ca2+ nor modified the KCl-induced increase in [Ca2+]i in freshly isolated cardiomyocytes. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that lysophosphatidic acid stimulated heart function under in vivo but not in vitro conditions. The positive inotropic effect of lysophosphatidic acid in vivo may be indirectly mediated by the activation of neurokinin type 1 receptors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".